Ask
Grounded answers from your library
Scoped Q&A with citations — verify claims against the sources you trust, not the open web. Memory keeps context across sessions.
All solutions
Business · decision workflow
Stakeholder asks “why?” — answer with the doc, not memory
Unify PRDs, competitive scans, and meeting transcripts in one initiative library. Ask pricing and scope questions with citations, capture meetings into searchable notes, and ship strategy briefs from Studio.
Meeting capture
Pricing scope shifted after customer interviews — timeline moved to Q4 for enterprise tier.
Continue writing
Polish tone
Summarize
Three steps are enough
01
Unify initiative knowledge
Import PRDs, customer interviews, competitive teardowns, and meeting transcripts into one project library with role-based access.
02
Ask with document citations
Query what changed in pricing, scope, or segments — answers link to the PRD paragraph or meeting note, not someone's memory.
03
Deliver briefs and decks
Generate strategy memos, stakeholder decks, and competitive scans from Content Factory using the same trusted corpus.
Does this sound familiar?
Decisions buried in Slack threads
Leadership asks why Q3 pricing changed — you scroll chat history instead of opening the decision doc.
New hires reconstruct history for days
Onboarding means paging the PM for context that already exists in PRDs and research nobody can find.
Strategy decks rebuilt every quarter
Same competitive research re-slid into PowerPoint instead of reusing prior analysis with updated citations.
Why Mindar fits this workflow
Single source per initiative
One library per product line or launch — private, team, or restricted access for sensitive docs.
Traceable business Q&A
Mindar cites PRDs, interviews, and meeting notes in every answer — ready for stakeholder meetings.
Meeting → library pipeline
Record or upload transcripts into AI Notes, then link takeaways to the project library.
Closer to how you actually work
Project library
PRDs, research, and transcripts in one searchable base.
Cited business Q&A
Scope, pricing, and segment questions with source chips.
AI Notes & recording
Meeting capture, transcription, and follow-up drafts.
Strategy outputs
Briefs, decks, and competitive scans from Studio.
Strategy brief
Decision memo with evidence links
Meeting summary
Actions with source references
Competitive scan
Comparison from teardown docs
Stakeholder deck
Slides from project corpus
Mindar Agent
One agent product — three ways it works for everyone
Every use case shares the same intersection: grounded Ask, skill-driven Produce, and OpenClaw Watch. Skills — including expert templates from the plaza — plug into the modes your workflow needs most.
Produce
Skills turn corpus into deliverables
Workflow skills and expert templates assemble briefs, quizzes, scripts, and memos from the same library — library-grounded only.
Recommended agent
Team Knowledge
Task packs below combine library scope, skills, and deliverable templates for this workflow.
ask
Initiative Q&A
Stakeholder questions answered from PRDs and meeting notes — not Slack memory.
Skill · PRD-cited answers
produce
QBR brief
Quarterly brief from accumulated initiative corpus with document citations.
Skill · Delta strategy memo
Why Product teams choose Mindar
| Capability | Traditional tools | Mindar | General AI chat |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision traceability | “I think we decided that in Slack” | Answers cite PRDs and meeting notes | Confident replies without document proof |
| Onboarding speed | New hires reconstruct history for days | Scoped Q&A on the initiative library | Ask a chatbot with no project context |
| Meeting capture | Transcripts orphaned in separate tools | Recording → notes → searchable library | Notes disconnected from source docs |
| Reusable outputs | Copy-paste into separate tools | Studio generates guides, slides, quizzes | One-off text you reformat manually |
| Team alignment | Scattered in chat and email | Shared libraries with permissions | No shared source of truth |
How Product teams use Mindar
Trigger
Roadmap review Friday — leadership wants what changed since last week.
“I ask what changed in pricing and scope since the last PRD revision — Mindar cites the exact docs for the leadership deck instead of me reconstructing from Slack.”
Product manager
Outcome: Stakeholder-ready answers with document citations.
Common questions
Private, team, and public permission levels control who sees sensitive business documents.
Move faster with decisions your stakeholders can trace to sources.
Copy a starter prompt or open the web app — same library on desktop and web.
From our Q3 product materials only: summarize pricing and scope changes since last week, cite relevant documents, and draft a one-page strategy brief.
Explore other solutions